Strong Economy? Saskatchewan offers up its wealth.. at a rate of .05%.

This really will blow your mind.

PotashCorp earned $1.8 billion in 2011.
they paid 0.05% for the privilege.

Yes this actually happened and continues every year.
This is not free market economics, what does the SaskParty actually stand for.. because this is Corporate Socialism at its worst.

Strong Propaganda from the SaskParty
Strong Propaganda from the SaskParty

The Saskatchewan people, who collectively own those resources, recovered a total of  $76.5 million in royalties . That is not even one percent, how is that a strong economy? It is total economic incompetence (or worse). We could fund transit, we could reduce tuition or even offer it free..( the province collects less than 200 million from tuition).  We could build housing with our incredible wealth instead of giving it away to shareholders of potash companies that do not even live here. Global demand for potash looks good for the future.  An incentive that was put in place to grow capacity is now a giant sinkhole for Saskatchewan Potash Wealth. It is long past time for a review of our potash royalty structure.

The right royalty structure is complicated. But the fact that PotashCorp earned $1.8 billion last year and only paid back $76.5 million in royalties to Saskatchewan people suggest we might not have it quite right yet.
(Leader-Post, Feb 12/11).

According to Dr. Jack Mintz from the School of Public Policy at the University of Calgary, Saskatchewan’s current system is “just wrong”  and “it has actually reached the point of incoherence and absurdity, or a mess. ”

Dr. Colin Boyd, a professor at the Edwards School of Business at the University of Saskatchewan has questioned whether our current royalty structure is ensuring that we are “fairly sharing” in the profits which potash companies are making here.

Dr. Sylvain Charlebois, associate dean in the School of Management and Economics at the University of Guelph and a former professor at the University of Regina, says a review of our province’s royalty structure is “dearly needed” (The StarPhoenix, Feb 17/11).

The Sask Party government has said they will not review the royalty structure. There is a provincial election in spring.
we can make a change.
right here.

Our home, our ecology, our collective future.

Photo-of-children-WEBBeyond economic impacts something far greater is at stake at this time. It is nature of our very soul, our humanity. Have we become so bereft of the most basic human instinct, that to protect and nurture the life of future generations … our own children – that we have become the very thing that undermines our collective well being. A kind of madness where we can not help ourselves from cannabalizing our children’s future. Have we been as some have whispered of , overcome a dark force,  by the spirit of the wendigo because it does seem a kind of psychosis  for an organism to do this; to harm and even destroy the future of its own young. We seem to  have become victims of our own dizzying success.

Our capacity to feed and nourish the great numbers of us – has not been met yet by a new way of thinking and being where we are not locked in combat with the living world that sustains us and the future, rather we are nurturing who we truly are and that which sustains us – the great miracle of creation.

Our planet is dynamic and there have been periods of mass extinctions before humans arrived, some quite devastating. It now  our responsibility to understand and develop sustaining relationships with the planet  as there is no mistaking the incredible impact that our human family has and is having on this planet. For we are now the most significant factor in the present extinction, this is the age of humans and we are born of the cycles of nature.  Yes forests burn and we can be part of the forest system as first nations people were. We can cut trees down, burn small areas, burn large areas, we can be intelligent fire or as violently destructive as a meteor. Our collective annual  26.8 billion tonnes of co2 into the atmosphere alters previous climate stable states, and introduces an element of chaos that will eventually re establish into a new steady state. Forests may become grasslands …  or a desert. Human beings are now determining what the next epoch on this planet will look like. Welcome to the anthropocene, an era where human beings have become the dominant factor in determining what that age will be. Our collective efforts our now so vast, they rival an ice age – or the impact of an astroid. 

Clearly the economic model which has brought us here can no longer be applied with such force to our collective future and the well-being of this planet, is our home. Change is come.
Daeran Gall

Potash revenue policies are absurd

“For a government’s fiscal program to best serve the public interest, while also ensuring sufficient public revenue collection, it has to meet three criteria: efficiency, simplicity and fairness. Unfortunately, the royalty and tax system currently in place for Saskatchewan’s robust potash-mining industry is none of these three things; it has actually reached the point of incoherence and absurdity, or a mess.”

Dr. Jack Mintz,
chair of the University of Calgary’s school of public policy.

Potash revenue mess costing the province billions every year.

Potash revenue mess costing the province billions every year

It is important to be engaged in the events and policies that directly affect us. Consider this, the average Saskatchewan family of four has forgone 60,000 dollars of revenue over the last 10 years, due to a very generous incentive to the Potash Industry, at least half that much again has been lost in poorly thought out incentives and royalties to the oil and gas industry.

Research on this topic will bring up the name of Jack Mintz a highly regarded  and awarded economist.  Dr. Jack Mintz was appointed to the Palmer Chair in Public Policy at the University of Calgary in January 2008. Dr. Mintz has consulted widely with the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, the governments of Canada, Alberta, New Brunswick, Ontario, and Saskatchewan, as well as various businesses and non-profit organizations. Dr. Mintz has this to say about our governments arrangements with the  potash industry

“For a government’s fiscal program to best serve the public interest, while also ensuring sufficient public revenue collection, it has to meet three criteria: efficiency, simplicity and fairness. Unfortunately, the royalty and tax system currently in place for Saskatchewan’s robust potash-mining industry is none of these three things; it has actually reached the point of incoherence and absurdity, or a mess.”

How did this happen?


Imagine that you own a farm. Your operation turns a fair profit, some years it is modest but you have seen positive cash flow for at least 9 out of 10 years. Now imagine that the government will credit you on taxes and other expenses like interest for the cost of any expansion you decide to undertake, plus 20%. So for every million dollars you invest you will receive one million dollars plus two hundred thousand above your investment as a credit against taxes and other costs. Sweet deal. Now it won’t take long before every farmer that is cash flow positive to realize that they can in effect actually make money simply by expanding. The more they expand, the more money they make, the more taxes and utilities they will have to pay, however they will be given credits against those costs simply by borrowing if needed and expanding further. This is what is called in economic terms a distortion in the market place. Farmers are not being rewarded for being efficient or for keeping their operations in line with demand and supply. The risks of expanding the business are being absorbed in large part by the public purse creating an economic ‘moral hazard’, as well as encouraging expansion that will if in place too long will negatively impact the price.


It is called a moral hazard because it rewards behaviours that are economically unsound and this may have a disastrous outcome if left unchecked. Farmer’s with such a cost plus incentive will expand production rapidly as long as there is a profit to be made. There will be those who will move aggressively, overtaking and buying out smaller more prudent operations, pushing everyone to capitalize on the money to be had by maximizing the returns on the the incentive. Eventually if the market segment being stimulated is large enough, the production increase will cause the commodity price to collapse and the house of cards falls down. This is a market intervention that if it comes to a bad end, the cost will be born to a large extent by the public. Moral hazard number two; business will not be expected to pay for bad economic choices made by the public that caused the situation in the first place.


This is what is happening now in the Potash industry in Saskatchewan, (and it has happened before). The policy currently in place is the 120 per cent “super capital cost allowance” allowing companies to claim 120 per cent of their capital expenditures against their royalties and taxes. It has resulted in expansion projects totalling over $13 billion in the past 5 years. Multiply that by 1.2 and you have $15.6 billion in credits that the tax paying public will absorb. This incentive is an economic weapon of mass destruction for the province that will leave a nuclear sized crater. It is madness to put in place an incentive the rewards cost plus 20%. A thirty percent incentive would have been reasonable and even that should have been shut down by now. This industry is currently very profitable and has no need for further public incentives at this time. Even more troubling is that Saskatchewan is the biggest supplier of Potash in the world. In effect we control the price. If we expand beyond market capacity the price will drop, and with the capital cost credit over our heads it could cost us ever increasing amounts in the near future.


by the numbers

cost to the provincial treasury

$2.4 billion in both 2010 and 2011

and $3.6 billion for 2012 and 2013
when you factor in previous years and current data the total easily exceeds 15 Billion dollars. This lost revenue will grow ever larger with new larger credits to pay out. As citizens of the  province we may find ourselves again in a tax loss situation regarding potash even though the industry itself making billions.

“the government incurred a tax loss in three of the four years and generated very little revenue in 2011 through the potash tax.”
Jack Mintz

That is absurd.

Norway plans ambitious new wind power goals

Norway has lagged neighbour Sweden in attracting wind power projects but planned changes to tax rules are expected to lure investors back.

Norway and Sweden launched a common renewable support scheme in 2012, the first of such kind in the world, to boost output from green energy sources, such as wind, solar and biomass, by 26.4 terawatt-hours (TWh) by 2020.

While Sweden has managed to erect wind turbines able to produce up to 6.6 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity per year, Norway has added just 0.3 TWh. Most of the new investment in Norway went to hydropower, which is already the source of 95 percent of the country’s electricity.

To change the situation and help the wind industry, the Norwegian government has decided to harmonize depreciation rules to bring them in line with Sweden and parliament is expected to approve the new tax rules in spring.

“They are basically copying the Swedish depreciation rules, which would allow investments to be recoved faster, and this is a major step for the wind industry,” said Andreas Thon Aasheim, an advisor at Norwegian wind power association Norwea.

By boosting wind power generation, Norway would be able to save water in its reservoirs and export hydropower to European countries to help them replace power generated by fossil fuels. It would increase Norway’s security of power supply in dry years, even if wind power can be more volatile.

More wind power should also lead to lower, but more volatile, wholesale electricity prices as wind power has close to zero marginal costs.


Norwea’s Aasheim said he expected the tax amendments to result in several investment decisions in Norway this year which could increase wind output significantly, when built.

“We can still add 6-8 TWh in new wind power production by 2020 (under the support scheme) as a result of these decisions, though the situation wouldn’t change immediately,” Aasheim said.

Including output from wind farms, which were built before 2012 or were not included in the “green certificate” scheme, wind turbines produced 11.5 TWh in Sweden and 2.2 TWh in Norway in 2014, data showed.

Aasheim said Norwegian wind projects could be helped if wind turbine producers cut their prices to get a slice of the market.

“There is fierce competition between wind turbine suppliers to enter the market in Norway, which still remains no man’s land in terms of wind power,” Aasheim said.

Danish wind turbine manufacturer Vestas Wind Systems signed a letter of intent with Norway’s state-owned energy group Statkraft in January to supply wind turbines for six planned wind farms.

Denmark generated 13.1 TWh in wind power in 2014, accounting to 39 percent of its total consumption, the latest data from Danish Energy Agency showed.
(Reporting by Nerijus Adomaitis; editing by David Clarke)

original file